CABANATUAN CITY – President
Aquino’s scolding of the National Irrigation Administration on its 50th
(Golden) anniversary rites Tuesday afternoon has drawn a sharp reaction from
officials and rank-and-file employees of the agency who rebuked the Chief
Executive for allegedly spoiling the party and for being a KJ (killjoy) because
of his “un-presidential sermon.”
Several NIA
officials and employees interviewed by The STAR said Mr. Aquino’s attack on NIA
Administrator Antonio Nangel and the agency’s supposed failure to meet its
targets was uncalled for and inappropriate as he ignored the agency’s having
achieved corporate financial viability, the first time it has happened in 50
years.
The President,
in his 15-minute speech at the NIA compound, said he was “dismayed” with the
NIA leadership because it was only able to irrigate 52,000 hectares out of its
81,170-hectare target in 2012, or a 65% accomplishment rate.
The President
started his speech by citing that from 2001 to 2009, NIA failed to meet its
yearly irrigation targets, getting as far as only 66%. He said in 2011, when he
is already President, NIA was able to irrigate 32,830 out of its target area of
37,659 hectares or a high 87%.
He said he was
dismayed that this was never sustained as only a year later, the percentage
irrigated compared to the target was only 65%. “We are now back to line of 6.
We might slide back to 30%,” he said.
“I will be
honest with you, I am still dismayed because until now, it shows that there is
little change happening in the National Irrigation Administration. We are
already in the middle of our term and it is difficult if until now, you still
don’t know what you want to do,” he said, as Agriculture Secretary Proceso
Alcala who introduced him and Nangel, listened stoically.
Mr. Aquino said
he is not a CCTV who could possibly monitor the performance of each government
agency. He said he won’t accept lame excuses.
The President
also failed to hide his disappointment over the failure of NIA to implement the
Balog-Balog Irrigation Project in his home province of Tarlac .
He said the project was conceptualized as early as the term of his late mother,
former President Corazon Aquino but this has not started nor broken ground yet
after almost three decades.
“We are already
three years in office yet nothing has happened. Is this worth being funded? If
so, let’s do it. If not, let’s stop it altogether,” he said.
He said if only
the BIP was implemented, then the harvest cycle in Tarlac would have been 7.5 a
year. “It’s rice already turned stone,” he lamented.
Turning to
Nangel, he said : “Administrator Nangel, help me to implement it. If you want
to do it, nothing is impossible. If you don’t want to, it’s impossible,” he
said.
After finishing
his sermon, the President left in a huff, without even waving to the crowd who
he failed to acknowledge at the start of his speech.
Prior to Mr.
Aquino’s speech, the atmosphere inside the oven-hot venue was festive and
upbeat as Nangel excitedly rattled off the agency’s accomplishments under his
watch. He said that irrigation development in the country rose from 49% in 2009
to 56% in 2012 owing to the funding support from the Aquino administration.
He said NIA was
able to restore idle farms, adding it only needs to irrigate 12,000 hectares to
achieve the Rice Self-Sufficiency Program by the end of this year.
Nangel said NIA
is focused, not only on its mandate of irrigation
development, considered the key to increased crop output along with improved quality of rice seeds, post-harvest
facilities, marketing and credit support and farm mechanization; but also on construction of mini-hydro power plants along
irrigation canals, eco-tourism in reservoir, and potable water supply.
Turning the
tables on Aquino, NIA officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the
President failed to take into account the attainment of financial viability
under the leadership of Alcala and Nangel.
NIA officials
and personnel said President Aquino appears to have engaged in fault-finding. “What
he saw are the supposed failures of NIA but what about the accomplishments like
the viability? Maybe he does not know what viability meant. He entirely missed
the point,” one of them said.
A former NIA
administrator who heard the tongue-lashing, said the timing was inappropriate.
“It’s supposed to be a time of jubilation, of celebration because it’s the
NIA’s 50th year. Everybody was full of energy then suddenly he would
spoil the whole party with his sermon,” the former official said.
He admitted,
however that with P-Noy, “expect the unexpected.”
Several
employees, including those who traveled all the way from far-flung provinces,
said what they expected from the President was the announcement of the grant of
an anniversary bonus. “Instead, what we got was anniversary sermon. He is a
true-blue KJ (killjoy),” one of them complained.
Another said the
President picked the wrong agency in highlighting bad performance. “We won’t
take it sitting down. Why, is the DPWH (Department of Public Works and
Highways) better off than the NIA? Of course not. It’s still graft-ridden,” the
employee said.
Others said the
supposed “bad performance” of NIA from 2001 to 2009 should not be blamed on
Nangel since he only came in only as administrator in 2010.
Another employee
said the agency would be better off by not inviting the Chief Executive in next
year’s anniversary rites “so as not to spoil the fun.” (Manny Galvez)