MANILA- Allegations
of massive graft and corruption in the National Irrigation Administration are
grossly unfounded and without strong basis, an investigating team tasked to
look into the reported irregularities reported yesterday.
In a report released by the internal audit
services (IAS) of the agency, it said its probe team which conducted an
exhaustive investigation unearthed not a single anomaly committed by NIA
officials as claimed by the NIA Employees Association of the Philippines
(NIAEASP).
Florentino David, IAS manager, said
the results of their findings have been forwarded last March 20 to the NIA
Board of Directors (BOD) which later instructed Administrator Claro Maranan to
furnish the same to the NIAEASP itself and to the Department of Agriculture. It
will also be submitted to President Aquino.
“Based on the results of our
investigation, our investigating team found certain minimal lapses in carrying out
some projects but overall, we have not discovered massive anomalies as claimed
by the NIAEASP,” said David.
Maranan said the investigation was
arrived at after almost two weeks. He said that in spite of what is
happening, the NIA will continue moving
forward and perform its mandate of providing irrigation service to Filipino
farmers.
“We are bent on instituting reforms at
NIA. Along the way, certain sectors are not compatible with some officials although
the complaining groups themselves admitted that “allegations are not synonymous
with proof,” he said, quoting from the open letter.
The IAS came out with its findings
after the NIAEASP, together with three other groups came out with an open
letter Tuesday calling on President Aquino to investigate alleged
irregularities inside NIA involving deputy administrators Modesto Membreve and
Lorna Grace Rosario and DA Undersecretary Antonio Fleta.
In their open letter, contained in a
whole-page paid advertisement in a national daily, the concerned officials said
they have nothing personal against Fleta and the two other NIA officials but
just wanted the irregularities investigated and pending the results, that they
be relieved from their posts.
The open-letter followed a February
6 letter-manifesto of the NIAEASP to Mr. Aquino where it lamented the “very
serious and alarming developments” in the agency.
Rosario was
accused by the NIAEASP of allegedly ordering the payment of 50 percent of the
billing of a contractor who has a project in Sarangani even if the said contractor
almost has no physical accomplishment.
She allegedly issued
the note “kindly facilitate the 50% progress billing” of the contractor in the
construction of an intake structure in Kiamba, Sarangani last December. The
actual physical accomplishment of the project was only 4.83% as of January.
Rosario decried the accusations, saying it was apparently
a demolition job orchestrated by
lower-level agency officials to besmirch her reputation and that of her
husband, Binmaley, Pangasinan Mayor Simplicio Rosario.
The probe team
said based on their investigation, the contractor’s representative Jose Luis
Escalona was the one who manipulated the super imposition of the rubber stamp
of receipt from Rosario ’s
office and her supposed notation. She said the contractor was also found to
have falsified or bloated his project accomplishment.
The probe team also found nothing
earth-shaking in the allegations against Membreve that he ordered the
repackaging of projects from administration works to local minor contracts
worth P105 million, purportedly to draw kickbacks.
It said that
after looking into the allegations, it recommended to follow the Government
Procurement Policy Board resolutions 18 and 7 of 2006 and 2009, respectively
limiting administration work of P5 to 20 million but not P105 million.
The
investigating team also cleared the
BOD of allegations it arbitrarily and capriciously issued policies that usurped
the powers of the NIA administrator by arrogating to itself the authority to approve
the appointment of officials from salary Grade 24 and above.
“The
board does not usurp powers because it is at the top of hierarchy of the
corporation,” it said, adding its powers and functions are well-defined in
Section 4, Article 3 and Section 8(d) of Republic Act 3601, the law that
created the NIA.
On
claims that the BOD has sown havoc and demoralization through indiscriminate
reshuffling of officials, the probe team said all approved high-level
reshuffling, reassignment and appointments were made mainly on the basis of the
recommendations to the BOD by former and current NIA administrators.
It
cited a letter from BOD member Ismael Tabije who said there was never an
instance a reshuffling order was initiated by the board.
Quoting
Tabije, the probe team said the board’s concurrences to the administrator’s
recommendations were on the basis of “our collective thinking that he is the
Chief Executive of the agency and as such, his recommendations should be given
significant weight in the final decision.” – Manny Galvez