MANILA-A top-ranking official of the Department of Agriculture and
a known trusted ally of Secretary Proceso Alcala on Monday denied the existence
of irregularities in the Board of Directors (BOD) of the National Irrigation Administration, saying the
allegations implicating him and two other NIA officials in the supposed
corruption were the collateral damage of the reforms they are trying to institute
in the controversial agency.
Breaking his silence on the issue, DA Undersecretary for
finance Antonio Fleta said some regional directors at NIA were unhappy with the
reforms being implemented by Alcala and came out with their accusations which were later dismissed as
“unfounded and without strong legal basis” by the NIA’s internal audit services
(IAS).
Fleta said the allegations against him stemmed from the
reshuffling and re-assignment of some regional directors which prompted its
employees’ association to claim that the Board has usurped the functions of the
administrator.
“This (reassignment of regional directors) is part of the
reforms we are doing now. The President mandated that there must be reforms so
we recommended the reassignment of some regional directors to the Board,” Fleta
said.
“Of course when you institute changes, surely there will be
some resistance,” he said.
Fleta came out with his statements after the IAS issued its
findings clearing him, and NIA deputy administrators Modesto Membreve and Lorna
Grace Rosario of involvement in irregularities as claimed by the NIA Employes
Association of the Philippines (NIAEASP), which, together with three other
groups came out with an open letter calling on President Aquino to investigate
him and the two officials.
In their open letter, contained in a whole-page paid
advertisement in a national daily, the concerned officials said they have
nothing personal against Fleta and the two other NIA officials but just wanted
the irregularities investigated and pending the results, that they be relieved
from their posts.
The open-letter followed a February
6 letter-manifesto of the NIAEASP to Mr. Aquino where it lamented the “very
serious and alarming developments” in the agency.
Fleta
said he welcomes any investigation to clear his name. He said he was
disappointed the issue was published in the newspapers. “Why didn’t they just
bring it before the Ombudsman?,” he said.
Fleta said prior to the reassignment of regional directors,
they were asked to present their respective accomplishments. He said one
regional director has been in his post for 20 years.
“He’s been there for 20 years so it’s about time he is
replaced. Familiarity breeds contempt. If you are really good, you are not only
good in your place but in other places as well,” he said.
He said it was puzzling why the NIAEASP was reacting to the
reshuffling when the employees were not even covered by it. “The NIAEASP has no
business in the reshuffling. It is not against their interests,” he said,
adding the role of the BOD like himself is policy-making.
Fleta said his accusers dug up fabricated accusations and
imputed malicious allegations. He said he is studying the filing of legal
action against those involved.
He said the black propaganda campaign was well-funded and
those who signed the open letter to Mr. Aquino was treated to a junket in Cebu.
Fleta said some of those who signed the open letter have
signified intention to apologize.
NIA Administrator Claro Maranan earlier said NIA is bent on
instituting reforms at NIA.
“Along the way, certain sectors are not compatible with
some officials although the complaining groups themselves admitted that
“allegations are not synonymous with proof,” he said, quoting from the open
letter. – Manny Galvez
