CABANATUAN CITY, Nueva Ecija–The National
Labor Relations Commission yesterday officially reinstated a university
president who was unceremoniously ousted
from his post two years ago in a tension-filled return marked by a
confrontation between the lady sheriff and school officials.
Prof.
Manuel Palomo Sr. was accompanied by NLRC Region 3 Sheriff Aida Gervacio who
served at 10 am the writ of execution of the 28-page March 11 decision issued
by regional labor arbiter Mariano Bactin which ruled that Palomo Sr.’s
dismissal as Wesleyan University president was illegal and unjustified. With
him was his son and namesake Manuel who was also ordered reinstated as chief
administrative officer by the NLRB.
Palomo
was ousted last March 11,2012 in a resolution of the WUP’s board of trustees
(BOT). It was affirmed on the same day by the United
Methodist Church ’s
College of Bishops (COB) which selects the
university president as well as the
members of the BOT.
In
ordering Palomo Sr. reinstated, the NLRC
also ordered the BOT and the COB to indemnify him P8.544 million in
backwages; actual, moral and exemplary damages and attorney’s fees. Palomo was
represented in the labor suit by lawyer Valentino F.P. Alberto.
The
serving of the writ was marred by tension when Gervacio confronted the security
officers and university officials manning the gate when they barred the Palomo
father-and-son and Gervacio from entering the university compound allegedly on
instructions from the school’s officer-in-charge Pacifico |Aniag.
Gervacio
was likewise denied entry inside the gate by security officer Julio Minor,
prompting her to remark : “Why don’t you allow us to go in? The Wesleyan is not
treating its visitors well,” she said. She warned that the security officers run
the risk of being cited for contempt.
The
two Palomos stayed inside their vehicle while Gervacio was confronting the
university officials. They left without alighting from their car.
Gervacio
was met outside the school’s premises by Ma. Niña Regala, Aniag’s secretary and
general services officer Crisaldo Vicencio. Regala received the copy of the
writ and signed it under the acacia tree amid the scorching heat in the
presence of the media, security guards of the school and two lawmen who stood
guard outside with a patrol car on standby.
A
brief commotion ensued when other vehicles were also barred from entering the
school premises. A mother asked the guard on duty if she could be permitted to
go in as she was to have her child enrolled.
Aniag
was not around when the writ was served. He has not been returning calls nor
answering text messages on his mobile phone.
His
executive assistant Reynaldo Samonte said he was on a four-day meeting in his
hometown in Bulacan and will return on Friday. Samonte
said they won’t allow Palomo to go inside the school since they have secured an
injunction preventing him from entering the school compound.
Gervacio
said with the serving of the writ, Palomo
Sr. is now considered officially reinstated even if he has not set foot
inside the university even with the injunction which, she said, is not
permanent. She said his reinstatement is effective March 11 when the decision
was made.
Palomo
Sr. said that based on the implementation of the writ of execution by the
sheriff, which has become final, he said he expects Aniag to step down as OIC to
give way to him.
“I
now expect the OIC to show some chivalry and delicadeza to immediately vacate
the position and give way to me as the legal president,” he said. “He should
now pack his bags and go back to Bulacan to where he belongs.”
He
said the College of Bishops had assured him that they would respect the NLRC
decision ordering his reinstatement.
He said the injunction being cited in
preventing him from entering the school is not applicable in his case because
he has already issued an affidavit of undertaking not to enter the school
premises or any of its campuses without any order issued by the court or other
agency or entity having jurisdiction on the case.
Palomo
clarified that he never intended to enter the school but the writ stated that
his reinstatement required him to be physically present.
He
said he didn’t feel bad about not being able to gain entry inside the school.
However, he lamented the shabby treatment Gervacio was subjected to in
enforcing the writ. “Imagine an agent of the law being given that kind of
treatment?” he asked.
The
NLRC said it “found substantial, convincing and competent evidence” that Palomo
– who was elected to a five-year term in 2009 which will end this April 30 - was
illegally and unjustifiably dismissed as university president after careful
evaluation of the facts presented.
After
serving for over two years, Palomo filed a one-year leave of absence without
pay on June 11,2011 amid graft allegations against his administration. He said
he was doing it for the sake of peace within the university.
In issuing the
ruling, the NLRC noted that it gives respect to the UMC which owns and runs the
university, thinking that it should be the champion in upholding the basic
rights of its members, officers and employees. “However, in the case of the
complainant, we failed to see all his basic rights were duly protected and
respected. We cannot close our eyes to reality, particularly if the basic
rights of our citizens will be trampled, disregarded and denied by those
persons and parties who are supposed to uphold them,” the decision said.
It added that the
act of the BOT recommending to the COB the summary dismissal of Palomo which
the latter approved in just a one-day period “is a clear case of deprivation of
the complainant’s right to due process, the right and opportunity to know the
charges against him and to have a hearing to explain his side, and confront his
accusers.” (Manny Galvez)
No comments:
Post a Comment